<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 201 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777712</link>
    <description>Extraordinary directions for CBI transfer, SFIO investigation, or further ED action were not warranted where ordinary statutory machinery was already in motion. The text explains that CBI investigation is a rare and exceptional measure, and was declined because multiple FIRs and local police investigations were already underway, the alleged transactions were linked outside Delhi, and no Delhi cause of action was shown. SFIO intervention was also refused because company-affairs investigation must proceed within the Companies Act framework and the complaints had already been forwarded to the competent authorities. Further judicial direction to the ED was unnecessary because it had already begun preliminary scrutiny under the PMLA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 08:40:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 201 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777712</link>
      <description>Extraordinary directions for CBI transfer, SFIO investigation, or further ED action were not warranted where ordinary statutory machinery was already in motion. The text explains that CBI investigation is a rare and exceptional measure, and was declined because multiple FIRs and local police investigations were already underway, the alleged transactions were linked outside Delhi, and no Delhi cause of action was shown. SFIO intervention was also refused because company-affairs investigation must proceed within the Companies Act framework and the complaints had already been forwarded to the competent authorities. Further judicial direction to the ED was unnecessary because it had already begun preliminary scrutiny under the PMLA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>