<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 204 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777715</link>
    <description>HC found no conclusive evidence that the artwork originated in Pakistan and held the valuer&#039;s Rs.30 lakh valuation to be approximate and unsupported. The court ordered release of the artwork to the petitioner, subject to deposit of Rs.2,00,000 as an ad-hoc differential duty and Rs.30,000 as the redemption fee under s.125 of the Customs Act, 1962, and further orders of the HC. Petition disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 08:40:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 204 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777715</link>
      <description>HC found no conclusive evidence that the artwork originated in Pakistan and held the valuer&#039;s Rs.30 lakh valuation to be approximate and unsupported. The court ordered release of the artwork to the petitioner, subject to deposit of Rs.2,00,000 as an ad-hoc differential duty and Rs.30,000 as the redemption fee under s.125 of the Customs Act, 1962, and further orders of the HC. Petition disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>