<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 207 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777718</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the appeal, upholding the tribunal&#039;s finding that the imported Waksol products are classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 2712 as mixtures of wax with paraffins rather than under headings 3404 or 3405. The court found no error in the impugned order and rejected the revenue&#039;s contention invoking the extended period of limitation; consequential duty demands premised on classification under CTH 3404/3405 were not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 08:40:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 207 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777718</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the appeal, upholding the tribunal&#039;s finding that the imported Waksol products are classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 2712 as mixtures of wax with paraffins rather than under headings 3404 or 3405. The court found no error in the impugned order and rejected the revenue&#039;s contention invoking the extended period of limitation; consequential duty demands premised on classification under CTH 3404/3405 were not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>