<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 229 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777740</link>
    <description>Leave encashment paid during the year against prior years&#039; liability could not be disallowed again in processing under section 143(1) where the assessee&#039;s return already reflected the relevant disallowance for the unpaid provision. The processing adjustment wrongly treated the actual payment as separately disallowable despite the existing computation treatment, so the addition was held unsustainable and was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 08:40:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 229 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777740</link>
      <description>Leave encashment paid during the year against prior years&#039; liability could not be disallowed again in processing under section 143(1) where the assessee&#039;s return already reflected the relevant disallowance for the unpaid provision. The processing adjustment wrongly treated the actual payment as separately disallowable despite the existing computation treatment, so the addition was held unsustainable and was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>