<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 235 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777746</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI - AT upheld the assessee&#039;s appeal, finding that documents submitted to substantiate purchases could not be treated as bogus in light of a coordinate-bench conclusion. The Tribunal found merit in the grounds of appeal, deleted the addition made by the A.O. and confirmed by the CIT(A), and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 08:40:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 235 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777746</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI - AT upheld the assessee&#039;s appeal, finding that documents submitted to substantiate purchases could not be treated as bogus in light of a coordinate-bench conclusion. The Tribunal found merit in the grounds of appeal, deleted the addition made by the A.O. and confirmed by the CIT(A), and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>