<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 236 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777747</link>
    <description>ITAT (Kolkata) held that penalty under section 271AAB could not be sustained because no search was initiated against the assessee. CIT(A) found, and revenue failed to overturn, that the statutory requirement of a search under section 132 was absent, making section 271AAB inapplicable. Accordingly, the penalty was deleted and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 08:40:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 236 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777747</link>
      <description>ITAT (Kolkata) held that penalty under section 271AAB could not be sustained because no search was initiated against the assessee. CIT(A) found, and revenue failed to overturn, that the statutory requirement of a search under section 132 was absent, making section 271AAB inapplicable. Accordingly, the penalty was deleted and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>