<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 245 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777756</link>
    <description>HC held that deduction of 20% TDS from the interest component of motor-accident compensation was lawful because each claimant&#039;s share of interest exceeded Rs.50,000 in the financial year. The executing court erred in directing refund of Rs.78,150 to the petitioner; that order was set aside and the petition allowed. Claimants remain free to seek any refund from the Income Tax Department under statutory procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 08:40:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 245 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777756</link>
      <description>HC held that deduction of 20% TDS from the interest component of motor-accident compensation was lawful because each claimant&#039;s share of interest exceeded Rs.50,000 in the financial year. The executing court erred in directing refund of Rs.78,150 to the petitioner; that order was set aside and the petition allowed. Claimants remain free to seek any refund from the Income Tax Department under statutory procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>