<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 141 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46260</link>
    <description>Under Rule 4(2) of the Hot Re-Rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997, a change in annual capacity parameters becomes operative only when the Commissioner makes the statutory determination. A mere request or letter from the assessee does not itself alter the applicable capacity for duty purposes. Until that determination is made, the assessee remains bound by the existing arrangement and liable accordingly. Precedents cited by the assessee were distinguished as fact-specific and not applicable on the records before the Court, so the Commissioner&#039;s action was upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:26:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 141 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46260</link>
      <description>Under Rule 4(2) of the Hot Re-Rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997, a change in annual capacity parameters becomes operative only when the Commissioner makes the statutory determination. A mere request or letter from the assessee does not itself alter the applicable capacity for duty purposes. Until that determination is made, the assessee remains bound by the existing arrangement and liable accordingly. Precedents cited by the assessee were distinguished as fact-specific and not applicable on the records before the Court, so the Commissioner&#039;s action was upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>