<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1602 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463475</link>
    <description>CESTAT, New Delhi (AT) dismissed the appeal for failure to make the court-ordered pre-deposit. The bench noted the appellant had been granted two months to comply and had since approached the HC by e-filing, but no favorable HC order existed as of the hearing date. Because the pre-deposit was not made, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 19:06:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1602 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463475</link>
      <description>CESTAT, New Delhi (AT) dismissed the appeal for failure to make the court-ordered pre-deposit. The bench noted the appellant had been granted two months to comply and had since approached the HC by e-filing, but no favorable HC order existed as of the hearing date. Because the pre-deposit was not made, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>