<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1462 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463477</link>
    <description>ITAT held that penalty under s.271(1)(c) could not be imposed where the assessing authority estimated income by applying a fair gross profit ratio to alleged bogus purchases. Relying on HC precedent, the Tribunal set aside the penalty and decided in favour of the assessee, finding the estimation method reasonable and not warranting penal action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 19:06:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1462 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463477</link>
      <description>ITAT held that penalty under s.271(1)(c) could not be imposed where the assessing authority estimated income by applying a fair gross profit ratio to alleged bogus purchases. Relying on HC precedent, the Tribunal set aside the penalty and decided in favour of the assessee, finding the estimation method reasonable and not warranting penal action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>