<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1860 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463483</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging an addition under s.14A read with Rule 8D, upholding the ITAT&#039;s reliance on its earlier, court-confirmed order and deciding in favour of the assessee. Regarding the addition for loss on preference shares written off, the HC found that the ITAT&#039;s straight reliance on precedent required fresh consideration and, with parties&#039; consent, remitted that issue to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 19:06:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1860 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463483</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging an addition under s.14A read with Rule 8D, upholding the ITAT&#039;s reliance on its earlier, court-confirmed order and deciding in favour of the assessee. Regarding the addition for loss on preference shares written off, the HC found that the ITAT&#039;s straight reliance on precedent required fresh consideration and, with parties&#039; consent, remitted that issue to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>