<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1486 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463487</link>
    <description>Petitioners&#039; challenge to reopening assessments prevailed: relying on the precedent in New India Assurance Co. Ltd., HC quashed and set aside the impugned orders under section 148A(d) and the notices issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act in the respective petitions. All petitions were disposed, and any consequential notices or orders were likewise quashed and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:18:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1486 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463487</link>
      <description>Petitioners&#039; challenge to reopening assessments prevailed: relying on the precedent in New India Assurance Co. Ltd., HC quashed and set aside the impugned orders under section 148A(d) and the notices issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act in the respective petitions. All petitions were disposed, and any consequential notices or orders were likewise quashed and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>