<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46253</link>
    <description>On the issue whether the Revenue was barred by limitation from recovering a refund granted pursuant to a Tribunal order later reversed by the SC, the SC held that restitution is a legal obligation flowing from reversal of the underlying adjudication. Since the refund was made only to comply with the Tribunal&#039;s order and that order was subsequently set aside, the assessee was bound in law to repay the refunded amount; the Tribunal&#039;s limitation-based approach was misconceived, particularly in view of the assessee&#039;s undertaking to restitute. The civil appeals were allowed, and recovery of the refund was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46253</link>
      <description>On the issue whether the Revenue was barred by limitation from recovering a refund granted pursuant to a Tribunal order later reversed by the SC, the SC held that restitution is a legal obligation flowing from reversal of the underlying adjudication. Since the refund was made only to comply with the Tribunal&#039;s order and that order was subsequently set aside, the assessee was bound in law to repay the refunded amount; the Tribunal&#039;s limitation-based approach was misconceived, particularly in view of the assessee&#039;s undertaking to restitute. The civil appeals were allowed, and recovery of the refund was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>