<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 96 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46247</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the order of confiscation of gold bars under the Customs Act, 1962. The court found that the petitioner&#039;s admission of concealing the gold bars exempted him from strict procedural requirements under Sections 102 and 103. The judgment emphasized compliance with statutory procedures and upheld the decision of the Customs Authorities regarding confiscation and penalties imposed on the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:38:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 96 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46247</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the order of confiscation of gold bars under the Customs Act, 1962. The court found that the petitioner&#039;s admission of concealing the gold bars exempted him from strict procedural requirements under Sections 102 and 103. The judgment emphasized compliance with statutory procedures and upheld the decision of the Customs Authorities regarding confiscation and penalties imposed on the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>