<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Orders under section 73 GST set aside for natural justice breach; matter remitted for fresh consideration</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92186</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned orders issued under section 73 of the GST Act and the consequential equal-amount penalty, holding that the adjudicating and appellate authorities violated principles of natural justice by failing to consider the petitioner&#039;s evidentiary materials and submissions. The court found the record demonstrated outward supplies supported by tax invoices, e-way bills and bank statements and that tax had been discharged, whereas the authorities proceeded on the premise of alleged inward supplies from a non-existent firm without verifying the petitioner&#039;s documentation. In consequence, the HC quashed the orders and remitted the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law and natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 08:19:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 08:19:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Orders under section 73 GST set aside for natural justice breach; matter remitted for fresh consideration</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92186</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned orders issued under section 73 of the GST Act and the consequential equal-amount penalty, holding that the adjudicating and appellate authorities violated principles of natural justice by failing to consider the petitioner&#039;s evidentiary materials and submissions. The court found the record demonstrated outward supplies supported by tax invoices, e-way bills and bank statements and that tax had been discharged, whereas the authorities proceeded on the premise of alleged inward supplies from a non-existent firm without verifying the petitioner&#039;s documentation. In consequence, the HC quashed the orders and remitted the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law and natural justice.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 08:19:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>