https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777648 HC quashed the government order directing SFIO to investigate the company and its affiliates under Section 212(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, and allowed the petition. The court found the order legally deficient for failing to articulate necessity, relying on non-existent or demonstrably absent circumstances, containing apparent misstatements, and exhibiting non-application of mind. The Central Government's omission to conduct the recommended inspection under Section 206(5) after an earlier inquiry under Section 206(4) and use of boilerplate reasoning rendered the exercise of power invalid. en-us Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Sep 2025 09:36:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777648 HC quashed the government order directing SFIO to investigate the company and its affiliates under Section 212(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, and allowed the petition. The court found the order legally deficient for failing to articulate necessity, relying on non-existent or demonstrably absent circumstances, containing apparent misstatements, and exhibiting non-application of mind. The Central Government's omission to conduct the recommended inspection under Section 206(5) after an earlier inquiry under Section 206(4) and use of boilerplate reasoning rendered the exercise of power invalid. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777648