https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777654 CESTAT, Allahabad (AT) dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982. The Tribunal noted the SC's condemnation of mechanical adjournments and that repeated extensions - beyond the statutorily permissible three adjournments - were unjustified. The appellant repeatedly failed to utilize court-granted opportunities, misused the grace shown, and the principal suit had since been disposed of; accordingly the appeal was dismissed. en-us Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Sep 2025 08:19:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777654 CESTAT, Allahabad (AT) dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982. The Tribunal noted the SC's condemnation of mechanical adjournments and that repeated extensions - beyond the statutorily permissible three adjournments - were unjustified. The appellant repeatedly failed to utilize court-granted opportunities, misused the grace shown, and the principal suit had since been disposed of; accordingly the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777654