<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 146 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777657</link>
    <description>A sexual harassment complaint alleging continuing acts was treated as a recurring grievance, so a rigid limitation objection under the POSH Act did not defeat it at the threshold and the matter could proceed on merits. The Internal Complaints Committee process was found procedurally unsafe because of concerns over constitution and haste, so the earlier report was to be ignored and a fresh committee was directed to conduct a de novo inquiry under the POSH Act and service rules. In the tax dispute, a settlement declaration under SVLDRS filed in the wrong category was treated as a false material disclosure, rendering the declaration ineffective and allowing the Department to proceed with adjudication of the show cause notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 18:04:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 146 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777657</link>
      <description>A sexual harassment complaint alleging continuing acts was treated as a recurring grievance, so a rigid limitation objection under the POSH Act did not defeat it at the threshold and the matter could proceed on merits. The Internal Complaints Committee process was found procedurally unsafe because of concerns over constitution and haste, so the earlier report was to be ignored and a fresh committee was directed to conduct a de novo inquiry under the POSH Act and service rules. In the tax dispute, a settlement declaration under SVLDRS filed in the wrong category was treated as a false material disclosure, rendering the declaration ineffective and allowing the Department to proceed with adjudication of the show cause notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>