https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777660 HC dismissed the revisions and upheld the trial court's rejection of the revisionist's Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. application. The plaint alleges the purchaser deposited the entire consideration and bought the property in joint names with his wife, who lacked means to purchase. On the plaint's face, the suit was not prima facie barred by Sections 3-4 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, so the trial court committed no error in refusing to strike out the plaint. en-us Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Aug 2025 14:35:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777660 HC dismissed the revisions and upheld the trial court's rejection of the revisionist's Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. application. The plaint alleges the purchaser deposited the entire consideration and bought the property in joint names with his wife, who lacked means to purchase. On the plaint's face, the suit was not prima facie barred by Sections 3-4 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, so the trial court committed no error in refusing to strike out the plaint. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777660