<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 154 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777665</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s disallowance relating to exempt income was accepted because it was computed on a scientific basis by allocating salary cost for investment-related personnel and factoring in time spent on purchase and sale transactions. On those facts, there was no basis to invoke the statutory machinery under section 14A(2) read with Rule 8D(ii) to enhance the disallowance, and the further addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 08:19:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 154 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777665</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s disallowance relating to exempt income was accepted because it was computed on a scientific basis by allocating salary cost for investment-related personnel and factoring in time spent on purchase and sale transactions. On those facts, there was no basis to invoke the statutory machinery under section 14A(2) read with Rule 8D(ii) to enhance the disallowance, and the further addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>