<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 173 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777684</link>
    <description>ITAT held that additions made in consequence of a search were unsustainable for assessment years that were unabated at the time of search; reliance on SC precedent requires specific incriminating/seized material to justify additions. Blank supplier letterheads were held to be &quot;dumb&quot; documents and not capable of sustaining additions. The tribunal ruled in favour of the assessee, disallowing the impugned additions for AYs 2011-12 to 2014-15.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 08:19:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 173 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777684</link>
      <description>ITAT held that additions made in consequence of a search were unsustainable for assessment years that were unabated at the time of search; reliance on SC precedent requires specific incriminating/seized material to justify additions. Blank supplier letterheads were held to be &quot;dumb&quot; documents and not capable of sustaining additions. The tribunal ruled in favour of the assessee, disallowing the impugned additions for AYs 2011-12 to 2014-15.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>