<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 174 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777685</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned and the Supreme Court disposed of the Revenue&#039;s special leave petitions by applying its earlier decision governing the same controversy. The assessing officers were directed to proceed in accordance with that settled legal position, while the assessees were left free to pursue further remedies as permitted by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 08:19:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 174 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777685</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned and the Supreme Court disposed of the Revenue&#039;s special leave petitions by applying its earlier decision governing the same controversy. The assessing officers were directed to proceed in accordance with that settled legal position, while the assessees were left free to pursue further remedies as permitted by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>