<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 53 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46232</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal, setting aside the previous order and remanding the case back to the Tribunal for reconsideration on the manufacturing aspect of rubberising and lining pipes. Parties can submit additional evidence, and no costs are awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:57:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 53 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46232</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal, setting aside the previous order and remanding the case back to the Tribunal for reconsideration on the manufacturing aspect of rubberising and lining pipes. Parties can submit additional evidence, and no costs are awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>