<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 2076 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463440</link>
    <description>NCLAT allowed the substitution application, permitting a shareholder and director to be substituted as appellant. The corporate debtor was ordered to be transposed as the second respondent and represented through its Internal Resolution Professional. The substitution application was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 19:03:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 2076 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463440</link>
      <description>NCLAT allowed the substitution application, permitting a shareholder and director to be substituted as appellant. The corporate debtor was ordered to be transposed as the second respondent and represented through its Internal Resolution Professional. The substitution application was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>