<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 2077 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463441</link>
    <description>NCLAT, applying SC authority, granted one week for an aggrieved person (shareholder/director) to seek substitution as appellant in place of the original corporate appellant. The tribunal permitted transposition of the original corporate appellant through an Insolvency Resolution Professional as third respondent. The second respondent was directed to file a reply affidavit on interim basis. Matter was adjourned for further hearing to 7 December 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 19:03:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 2077 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463441</link>
      <description>NCLAT, applying SC authority, granted one week for an aggrieved person (shareholder/director) to seek substitution as appellant in place of the original corporate appellant. The tribunal permitted transposition of the original corporate appellant through an Insolvency Resolution Professional as third respondent. The second respondent was directed to file a reply affidavit on interim basis. Matter was adjourned for further hearing to 7 December 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>