<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1678 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463460</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition and upheld the HC decision quashing prosecution arising from block assessments for the period 1.7.1995-1.1.1997, holding that no statutory provision then existed permitting prosecution for income disclosed in those block assessments. The Court found no need to consider applicability of Section 278E and declined the revenue&#039;s contention, concluding interference with the impugned judgment was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 19:03:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1678 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463460</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition and upheld the HC decision quashing prosecution arising from block assessments for the period 1.7.1995-1.1.1997, holding that no statutory provision then existed permitting prosecution for income disclosed in those block assessments. The Court found no need to consider applicability of Section 278E and declined the revenue&#039;s contention, concluding interference with the impugned judgment was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>