<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1920 (12) TMI 4 - MADRAS HIGH COURT [LB]</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463436</link>
    <description>Madras HC held that Section 89 of the Probate and Administration Act, 1881 excludes causes of action for defamation, assault and other personal injuries in the broad (Blackstonian) sense from survivorship; accordingly malicious prosecution and analogous personal torts do not survive the person. A suit for malicious prosecution abates on the defendant&#039;s death and cannot be continued against or by executors or administrators under Section 89.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 1920 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 15:04:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1920 (12) TMI 4 - MADRAS HIGH COURT [LB]</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463436</link>
      <description>Madras HC held that Section 89 of the Probate and Administration Act, 1881 excludes causes of action for defamation, assault and other personal injuries in the broad (Blackstonian) sense from survivorship; accordingly malicious prosecution and analogous personal torts do not survive the person. A suit for malicious prosecution abates on the defendant&#039;s death and cannot be continued against or by executors or administrators under Section 89.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 1920 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>