<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 75 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46221</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ application challenging the imposition of anti-dumping duty on KHS-68, citing the petitioner&#039;s suppression of material facts and the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 128 of the Customs Act for appealing customs authorities&#039; orders. The court emphasized that classification disputes should be resolved through statutory mechanisms, not writ jurisdiction, and directed the petitioner to pursue the available remedy. All applications were disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:28:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 75 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46221</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ application challenging the imposition of anti-dumping duty on KHS-68, citing the petitioner&#039;s suppression of material facts and the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 128 of the Customs Act for appealing customs authorities&#039; orders. The court emphasized that classification disputes should be resolved through statutory mechanisms, not writ jurisdiction, and directed the petitioner to pursue the available remedy. All applications were disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>