https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463434 Interconnect service charges paid to a non-resident telecom operator were treated as not constituting royalty for tax purposes. The Karnataka HC followed its earlier co-ordinate Bench ruling that such charges do not fall within the royalty characterisation, and it found no infirmity in the order under challenge. The issue was therefore answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. en-us Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Sep 2025 11:18:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463434 Interconnect service charges paid to a non-resident telecom operator were treated as not constituting royalty for tax purposes. The Karnataka HC followed its earlier co-ordinate Bench ruling that such charges do not fall within the royalty characterisation, and it found no infirmity in the order under challenge. The issue was therefore answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463434