<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 53 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46219</link>
    <description>Revenue&#039;s reference petition under section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held infructuous because the assessee had already taken credit of the deposited amount in the PLA in terms of the Tribunal&#039;s direction. The High Court noted that the original duty demand had been stayed only on condition of deposit, the amount was deposited, and the appellate relief had already worked out the consequence of refund or credit. With the disputed amount adjusted and the underlying controversy rendered academic, no subsisting question of law remained for reference and the Tribunal&#039;s direction required no interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:26:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 53 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46219</link>
      <description>Revenue&#039;s reference petition under section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held infructuous because the assessee had already taken credit of the deposited amount in the PLA in terms of the Tribunal&#039;s direction. The High Court noted that the original duty demand had been stayed only on condition of deposit, the amount was deposited, and the appellate relief had already worked out the consequence of refund or credit. With the disputed amount adjusted and the underlying controversy rendered academic, no subsisting question of law remained for reference and the Tribunal&#039;s direction required no interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>