<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 114 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46218</link>
    <description>The court granted the petition filed by a foreign-based electronics company seeking the return or re-export of unclaimed imported goods, asserting ownership rights as the goods were not cleared by the buyers. The court relied on legal precedent establishing that in cases of abandonment by importers, exporters retain ownership and can seek return or re-export. Despite allegations of under-valuation, the court emphasized the lack of justification for detaining the goods and allowed the petitioners to re-export the goods, making the rule absolute in their favor with a stay on the order&#039;s operation for six weeks and no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:24:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 114 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46218</link>
      <description>The court granted the petition filed by a foreign-based electronics company seeking the return or re-export of unclaimed imported goods, asserting ownership rights as the goods were not cleared by the buyers. The court relied on legal precedent establishing that in cases of abandonment by importers, exporters retain ownership and can seek return or re-export. Despite allegations of under-valuation, the court emphasized the lack of justification for detaining the goods and allowed the petitioners to re-export the goods, making the rule absolute in their favor with a stay on the order&#039;s operation for six weeks and no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>