<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Additions based on impounded third-party ledger held unsustainable; Section 292C favors assessee where document not self-speaking</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92137</link>
    <description>ITAT held that impugned additions made on the basis of an impounded third-party ledger could not be sustained and allowed the assessee&#039;s grounds. The Tribunal found the reproduced document belonged to third parties and, under Section 292C, its contents must be construed in favour of the assessee where the document is not self-speaking as proof of the assessee&#039;s income. The assessee, a property broker, could not be compelled to produce third-party originals; photocopies matching Party B&#039;s bank statement and confirmations of cheque issuance rebutted adverse inference. AO and lower authorities failed to undertake further inquiry despite having statutory powers; accordingly the additions were deleted and the assessment adjusted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Additions based on impounded third-party ledger held unsustainable; Section 292C favors assessee where document not self-speaking</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92137</link>
      <description>ITAT held that impugned additions made on the basis of an impounded third-party ledger could not be sustained and allowed the assessee&#039;s grounds. The Tribunal found the reproduced document belonged to third parties and, under Section 292C, its contents must be construed in favour of the assessee where the document is not self-speaking as proof of the assessee&#039;s income. The assessee, a property broker, could not be compelled to produce third-party originals; photocopies matching Party B&#039;s bank statement and confirmations of cheque issuance rebutted adverse inference. AO and lower authorities failed to undertake further inquiry despite having statutory powers; accordingly the additions were deleted and the assessment adjusted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>