<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue appeal dismissed; assessee&#039;s NRV ageing stock-valuation upheld, Rs.10,66,150 omission allowed and excess stock addition deleted</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92122</link>
    <description>ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s consistent stock-valuation policy (NRV by ageing: current year 100%, one year 90%, two years 80%, older 50%) and noted the AO had earlier accepted similar treatment for another AY; valuation challenge lacked merit. A totalling omission of Rs.10,66,150 established in the survey records was allowed to the assessee. Consequently the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition relating to excess stock (net discrepancy</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue appeal dismissed; assessee&#039;s NRV ageing stock-valuation upheld, Rs.10,66,150 omission allowed and excess stock addition deleted</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92122</link>
      <description>ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s consistent stock-valuation policy (NRV by ageing: current year 100%, one year 90%, two years 80%, older 50%) and noted the AO had earlier accepted similar treatment for another AY; valuation challenge lacked merit. A totalling omission of Rs.10,66,150 established in the survey records was allowed to the assessee. Consequently the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition relating to excess stock (net discrepancy</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>