<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777566</link>
    <description>HC refused relief and dismissed the writ petition, upholding the bank&#039;s declaration of the borrower&#039;s account as fraudulent under the RBI circular dated 15.07.2024. The court held that in view of the SC precedent, no remedy lies to challenge the fraud classification while the RBI circular remains in force; the petitioner must either pay the dues and seek appropriate relief or independently challenge the RBI circular. The petition was not admitted and was ordered dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777566</link>
      <description>HC refused relief and dismissed the writ petition, upholding the bank&#039;s declaration of the borrower&#039;s account as fraudulent under the RBI circular dated 15.07.2024. The court held that in view of the SC precedent, no remedy lies to challenge the fraud classification while the RBI circular remains in force; the petitioner must either pay the dues and seek appropriate relief or independently challenge the RBI circular. The petition was not admitted and was ordered dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>