<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 56 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777567</link>
    <description>HC set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order classifying steel grip insulating tape under the residuary Entry No.1, Part IV, Schedule II of the M.P. VAT Act. The court held the tape is primarily an insulator used to prevent shocks and short circuits, and therefore falls within Entry 50, Part II, Schedule II. Consequently the product is taxable under that specific entry at 5% and recovery of differential tax under the residual entry was not sustained. Petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 56 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777567</link>
      <description>HC set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order classifying steel grip insulating tape under the residuary Entry No.1, Part IV, Schedule II of the M.P. VAT Act. The court held the tape is primarily an insulator used to prevent shocks and short circuits, and therefore falls within Entry 50, Part II, Schedule II. Consequently the product is taxable under that specific entry at 5% and recovery of differential tax under the residual entry was not sustained. Petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>