<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 74 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46212</link>
    <description>The court granted an ex parte order in favor of the plaintiff, restraining defendants from interfering with their possession of vehicles and redeeming the pledge. Defendants were allowed custody of seized goods under court supervision, with restrictions on disposal. The judgment emphasized no decision on the case&#039;s merits was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:34:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 74 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46212</link>
      <description>The court granted an ex parte order in favor of the plaintiff, restraining defendants from interfering with their possession of vehicles and redeeming the pledge. Defendants were allowed custody of seized goods under court supervision, with restrictions on disposal. The judgment emphasized no decision on the case&#039;s merits was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>