<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 73 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777584</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal, quashing the revocation of the customs broker licence, forfeiture of security and penalty. The tribunal found verification records for only four alleged non-existent exporters and no contrary evidence for three; the fourth showed prior GST registration and returns, with postal and field enquiries indicating the exporter had occupied the premises before leaving by Feb 2020. On these findings the impugned order could not be sustained and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 73 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777584</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal, quashing the revocation of the customs broker licence, forfeiture of security and penalty. The tribunal found verification records for only four alleged non-existent exporters and no contrary evidence for three; the fourth showed prior GST registration and returns, with postal and field enquiries indicating the exporter had occupied the premises before leaving by Feb 2020. On these findings the impugned order could not be sustained and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>