<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 81 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777592</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld the addition under s. 43CA where the taxpayer sold a flat for Rs. 45,00,000 against a government stamp-duty valuation of Rs. 58,23,600. The AO added the shortfall as income; CIT(A) confirmed the addition noting absence of evidence of any appeal to the valuation authority. The assessee failed to produce supporting evidence and did not appear before the Tribunal. The appeal was dismissed and the addition sustained against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 81 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777592</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld the addition under s. 43CA where the taxpayer sold a flat for Rs. 45,00,000 against a government stamp-duty valuation of Rs. 58,23,600. The AO added the shortfall as income; CIT(A) confirmed the addition noting absence of evidence of any appeal to the valuation authority. The assessee failed to produce supporting evidence and did not appear before the Tribunal. The appeal was dismissed and the addition sustained against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>