https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777595 ITAT set aside the CIT(E) order rejecting registration under s.12AB, finding the rejection was based solely on an object clause suggesting activities outside India despite deed clauses repeatedly limiting activities and beneficiaries to within India. Relying on the Dedhia Music Foundation precedent, ITAT directed CIT to grant registration under s.12AB and consequentially quashed the rejection of s.80G registration, ordering the CIT to allow 80G. Appeals by the assessee were allowed. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777595 ITAT set aside the CIT(E) order rejecting registration under s.12AB, finding the rejection was based solely on an object clause suggesting activities outside India despite deed clauses repeatedly limiting activities and beneficiaries to within India. Relying on the Dedhia Music Foundation precedent, ITAT directed CIT to grant registration under s.12AB and consequentially quashed the rejection of s.80G registration, ordering the CIT to allow 80G. Appeals by the assessee were allowed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777595