<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 93 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777604</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed deduction under section 80P(2)(d) for interest income from deposits with co-operative banks but held that interest from a regional Gramin bank is not eligible under section 80P(2)(d). For the latter interest, the AO must allow a proportionate deduction of expenditure under section 57(iii) to the extent it is relatable with earning that income. The AO is directed to recompute total income accordingly; appeal partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 93 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777604</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed deduction under section 80P(2)(d) for interest income from deposits with co-operative banks but held that interest from a regional Gramin bank is not eligible under section 80P(2)(d). For the latter interest, the AO must allow a proportionate deduction of expenditure under section 57(iii) to the extent it is relatable with earning that income. The AO is directed to recompute total income accordingly; appeal partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>