<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 96 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777607</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI - AT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleted additions under section 68 for AYs 2006-07 and 2007-08. The tribunal held the assessments were &quot;unabated&quot; because a section 132 search on 19.10.2010 had triggered section 153A proceedings, and-following the SC&#039;s recent ruling-any addition in unabated assessments must be supported by seized/incriminating material. As the record contained no evidence that the AO based the section 68 additions on such seized material, the additions were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 96 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777607</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI - AT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleted additions under section 68 for AYs 2006-07 and 2007-08. The tribunal held the assessments were &quot;unabated&quot; because a section 132 search on 19.10.2010 had triggered section 153A proceedings, and-following the SC&#039;s recent ruling-any addition in unabated assessments must be supported by seized/incriminating material. As the record contained no evidence that the AO based the section 68 additions on such seized material, the additions were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>