https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46209 A Special Public Prosecutor appointed under Section 24(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is treated as a Public Prosecutor for the purposes of the Code, so an appeal for enhancement of sentence is not invalid merely because it was filed through such an appointee. The objection to maintainability on that ground was rejected. The Court also considered the matter suitable for revisional treatment in the circumstances, so the proceeding could be dealt with as a revision petition and examined on merits. The result was that the technical objection was removed and the matter was remitted for reconsideration in revision. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:28:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46209 A Special Public Prosecutor appointed under Section 24(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is treated as a Public Prosecutor for the purposes of the Code, so an appeal for enhancement of sentence is not invalid merely because it was filed through such an appointee. The objection to maintainability on that ground was rejected. The Court also considered the matter suitable for revisional treatment in the circumstances, so the proceeding could be dealt with as a revision petition and examined on merits. The result was that the technical objection was removed and the matter was remitted for reconsideration in revision. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46209