<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 110 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777621</link>
    <description>Amount deposited during GST inspection proceedings should not be finally treated as payable without adjudication where no substantive recovery notice has yet been issued. The HC held that any excess deposit, if ultimately found on final adjudication, is to be adjusted either against the liability determined or against any amount due in favour of the petitioner. It also observed that inspection-related proceedings under the GST framework should be concluded expeditiously. Relief was granted only to that limited extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 110 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777621</link>
      <description>Amount deposited during GST inspection proceedings should not be finally treated as payable without adjudication where no substantive recovery notice has yet been issued. The HC held that any excess deposit, if ultimately found on final adjudication, is to be adjusted either against the liability determined or against any amount due in favour of the petitioner. It also observed that inspection-related proceedings under the GST framework should be concluded expeditiously. Relief was granted only to that limited extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>