<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1664 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463409</link>
    <description>Mandatory safeguards under workplace sexual harassment law and the applicable service rules must be followed before imposing stigmatic punishment. The delinquent was not supplied the complaint or relied-on materials, no charge memo was issued, no independent departmental enquiry was held, and the enquiry report was not furnished before punishment; the action was therefore invalid and unsustainable. Proceedings were also defective because the complaint was raised after delay without a recorded basis for condonation, and the Internal Complaints Committee had commenced action before any valid written complaint by the aggrieved woman, making the initiation legally unsustainable. A regular service inquiry was required before compulsory retirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 19:17:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1664 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463409</link>
      <description>Mandatory safeguards under workplace sexual harassment law and the applicable service rules must be followed before imposing stigmatic punishment. The delinquent was not supplied the complaint or relied-on materials, no charge memo was issued, no independent departmental enquiry was held, and the enquiry report was not furnished before punishment; the action was therefore invalid and unsustainable. Proceedings were also defective because the complaint was raised after delay without a recorded basis for condonation, and the Internal Complaints Committee had commenced action before any valid written complaint by the aggrieved woman, making the initiation legally unsustainable. A regular service inquiry was required before compulsory retirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>