<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1796 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463425</link>
    <description>Interconnect service charges were examined on the question whether they constituted royalty. Following an earlier co-ordinate Bench ruling, the court applied the same view that such charges do not amount to royalty and found no infirmity in the order under challenge. On that basis, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 19:17:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1796 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463425</link>
      <description>Interconnect service charges were examined on the question whether they constituted royalty. Following an earlier co-ordinate Bench ruling, the court applied the same view that such charges do not amount to royalty and found no infirmity in the order under challenge. On that basis, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>