https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46190 The Court held that writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 were not maintainable due to the existence of a statutory remedy under Section 35L of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. It found that the issues raised fell within the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. The Court dismissed the writ petitions, directing the petitioners to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal to the Supreme Court under Section 35L without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. en-us Wed, 20 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46190 The Court held that writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 were not maintainable due to the existence of a statutory remedy under Section 35L of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. It found that the issues raised fell within the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. The Court dismissed the writ petitions, directing the petitioners to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal to the Supreme Court under Section 35L without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46190