<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 5 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777516</link>
    <description>The writ petition under Article 32 was dismissed, while leaving the petitioners free to seek intervention in the pending Constitution Bench proceedings or to pursue writ relief before the jurisdictional High Court under Article 226. The dismissal preserves access to alternative constitutional remedies without deciding the merits of the underlying grievance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2025 13:43:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 5 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777516</link>
      <description>The writ petition under Article 32 was dismissed, while leaving the petitioners free to seek intervention in the pending Constitution Bench proceedings or to pursue writ relief before the jurisdictional High Court under Article 226. The dismissal preserves access to alternative constitutional remedies without deciding the merits of the underlying grievance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>