<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 26 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777537</link>
    <description>Assessment framed u/s 143(3) by ITO-3(4) was quashed for want of a mandatory transfer order u/s 127 and absence of notice u/s 143(2), rendering the assessing officer without jurisdiction. The ITAT RAIPUR held the assessment void ab initio and allowed the appeal, confirming that in absence of an order of transfer by the Pr. CIT u/s 127 the assessment is bad in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 10:48:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 26 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777537</link>
      <description>Assessment framed u/s 143(3) by ITO-3(4) was quashed for want of a mandatory transfer order u/s 127 and absence of notice u/s 143(2), rendering the assessing officer without jurisdiction. The ITAT RAIPUR held the assessment void ab initio and allowed the appeal, confirming that in absence of an order of transfer by the Pr. CIT u/s 127 the assessment is bad in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>