https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777561 Detention, seizure and penalty under the GST law were upheld where goods were intercepted without an e-way bill at the relevant time and the bill was generated only after interception. The fact that the e-way bill was produced before the final seizure and penalty orders did not cure the initial non-compliance, because the record showed it was not generated immediately upon movement of the goods. The Court treated the matter as covered by the binding Division Bench decision relied on and rejected the writ petitions on merits, finding no ground to interfere with the impugned orders. en-us Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Sep 2025 08:13:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777561 Detention, seizure and penalty under the GST law were upheld where goods were intercepted without an e-way bill at the relevant time and the bill was generated only after interception. The fact that the e-way bill was produced before the final seizure and penalty orders did not cure the initial non-compliance, because the record showed it was not generated immediately upon movement of the goods. The Court treated the matter as covered by the binding Division Bench decision relied on and rejected the writ petitions on merits, finding no ground to interfere with the impugned orders. Case-Laws GST Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777561