<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1884 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463408</link>
    <description>The challenge concerned an impugned circular and the alleged lack of authority to delegate power to issue summons. The Court noted that the petitioner had established a strong prima facie case and held that the interim protection already granted should not be disturbed at this stage. On that basis, the applications seeking vacation of the stay were rejected, the stay order was continued, and the petition was listed for final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2025 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1884 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463408</link>
      <description>The challenge concerned an impugned circular and the alleged lack of authority to delegate power to issue summons. The Court noted that the petitioner had established a strong prima facie case and held that the interim protection already granted should not be disturbed at this stage. On that basis, the applications seeking vacation of the stay were rejected, the stay order was continued, and the petition was listed for final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>